{"id":5,"date":"2005-09-16T05:11:22","date_gmt":"2005-09-15T23:41:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scoobr.com\/niblettes_old\/?p=5"},"modified":"2021-06-12T03:42:30","modified_gmt":"2021-06-12T03:42:30","slug":"personas-scenarios-and-don-norman-part-ii","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.scoobr.com\/niblettes_old\/2005\/09\/16\/personas-scenarios-and-don-norman-part-ii\/","title":{"rendered":"Personas, Scenarios and Don Norman &#8211; Part II"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the first part of a discussion I had with Don Norman about his recently published articles on the use of personas and activity-based design&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><em>How does (or should) the thesis of your article, if accepted, affect a group&#8217;s use of personas as a design tool?  Should we forget about them (except as a communication tool) and concentrate on activities as the driving forces behind product design? <\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>Don:<\/strong> Well, we got along quite well without personas before they became popular. I do not think they are important for the intelligent, observant, designer. As I an d you) said, I think they are useful mainly in communicating the decisions to other people.<\/p>\n<p>I think the emphasis on activities is the key.<\/p>\n<p><em>Is there perhaps too much growing faith in the power of personas at the expense of in-depth understanding of activities and their associated problems? <\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>Don:<\/strong> Absolutely.  The persona still says nothing about how to design. <\/p>\n<p><em>Is a focus on activities perhaps too mechanistic, and blind to all the nuanced subjectivities of experience that contribute to a product&#8217;s success or failure, that are better captured between the lines of a persona narrative?  (sorry for the awkward sentence, but I could think of how to better phrase it) .<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>Don:<\/strong> No. <\/p>\n<p>Any single prescription runs the risk of being accepted mechanically.  But if you have only average designers, then mechanical solutions are apt to be pretty good &#8212; better than they might produce otherwise.   <\/p>\n<p><em>Is a persona centered design approach even a user centered design approach?  Or are many of us simply seduced by ease and economy of them compared with studying actual people?   <\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>Don:<\/strong> If you don&#8217;t study real people, then you can&#8217;t produce sensible personas!  A persona is, after all, a distillation of the knowledge gathered about numerous individuals. <\/p>\n<p><em>What is a comfortable balance between understanding people and activities in terms of designing better products?  Your articles hint at an answer here. <\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>Don:<\/strong> In no way can you understand activities without understanding people. An activity is the set of actions ( perceptions, thoughts, decisions, and actions) made within t he context of a set of goals. One cannot separate activities from people. Activities are goal-driven, and goals exist only in the heads of people.   A major support need is to handle changing goals, and interrupted goal-driven activity &#8212; and this involves people.<\/p>\n<p>Does this help at all?<\/p>\n<p>Thanks for writing, and for the useful set of questions.<\/p>\n<p>Don<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Part of a discussion I had with Don Norman about his recently published articles on the use of personas and activity-based design.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-old"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/parCYG-5","_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.scoobr.com\/niblettes_old\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.scoobr.com\/niblettes_old\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.scoobr.com\/niblettes_old\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.scoobr.com\/niblettes_old\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.scoobr.com\/niblettes_old\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/www.scoobr.com\/niblettes_old\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":473,"href":"http:\/\/www.scoobr.com\/niblettes_old\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5\/revisions\/473"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.scoobr.com\/niblettes_old\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.scoobr.com\/niblettes_old\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.scoobr.com\/niblettes_old\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}